Sunday, February 27, 2011
Relationships
I've had a few things on my mind the past few days, and a good portion of them have to do with relationships. I'll get to them, but for the sake of flow, I'll write the non-relationship story first.
As you know, I've been on a higher-calorie diet, trying to put a few pounds on. Although I have gained and lost and gained again and lost again, I am currently 3.5 pounds heavier than when I started in early January. Some of weight gain may be in ab muscle, since I've been doing yoga and pilates as well. I generally dislike the carbs that will help me gain, and I love nuts, proteins, and vegetable nutrients. So, I've adjusted my food plan so that I am gaining some weight in fat and some in muscle, while simultaneously raising my metabolism a little so I feel warmer during the day as well. It has helped. Although taking a snow-bathing-suit picture was still pretty darn cold. I still have bruises from that day too. I've learned that I have probably been pretty malnourished for a while. Since I began eating more calories, my fingernails grow faster, my face is clearer, I feel healthier, and I have virtually no menstrual cramps. And here I had no idea I was starving myself. Still... its been a struggle to gain more than 3.5 pounds and keep it on. Its like my body doesn't want to do it.
Ok, on to the relationship stuff. The two churches I attend with any form of regularity are both doing a relationship series. It is interesting to compare the two. I'm still not sure exactly what point the one church is trying to make. I believe it has to do with "becoming a better you" so you can become Mr. or Mrs. Right for someone. The other one has a lot to do with the ways men and women communicate or fail to communicate. To be honest, the first church is sort of "relationship advice for guys and gals" while the second church is "relationship advice for men and women." I feel I sort of relate to the second one a bit better, but the first one has its merits.
I recently read a friend's blog about traveling to Vermont with 23 youth group kids for a ski retreat. Her husband is the youth pastor, and although she takes a less active role in the church than she used to, she still gets involved with the kids and attends the winter retreats. Her photos looked like everyone, even the adults, had a lot of fun. I remembered the days when I used to chaperone on winter retreats for my home church. It was a lot of fun, and yes, the adults have their own camaraderie going on that the kids probably never notice. I sort of miss that kind of thing, but would also like someone to join me in that. In fact, I might miss church relationships in general... it might be time for me to get involved again with a church, although which one, I am not sure.
I also have been the recipient of an unexpected friendship. I say recipient because I am a golden-retriever personality type in the Smalley Personality Test. A golden retriever is someone who is extremely loyal, to the point of death, to a relationship she has chosen. However, a golden retriever cannot be forced into a relationship. They will never turn and bite because they have such good temperaments, but you cannot force them to love you. So, I have received friendship from someone who I am reluctant to give back to. Part of me feels bad, and the other part of me says, "I don't care, you can't make me, I won't do it." I can be quite stubborn like that. When I was in high school, this way of thinking would have been fine, just a part of my personality. But now that I am older, I feel that I am being immature. I should lay more boundaries in this friendship, but I hate conflict (another golden retriever quality) and so I avoid it. Am I misleading this person into thinking our friendship is a great one? Or can they read the non-verbal signs I am giving (such as the total non-interest in hanging out, complete lack of enthusiasm for the moments we do hang out, and the refusal to speak the same language)?
Going back to the church discussion of relationships, our homework last week was to write a letter of respect to one guy in our lives. (Guys were supposed to give 45 minutes of their time to a woman by listening to her talk). I really struggled with my homework, and actually, I didn't do it. Although I feel respect, I don't know how to verbalize it. I think that my way of expressing respect is to show love. I don't know how to simply say, "I respect you for ____."
Plus since I am not currently dating anyone, its a little iffy about who the recipient of this letter should be. Married folks were to do their homework for their spouse, and dating people presumably would do that for their significant other, especially if the relationship is struggling. But me... I don't know. The apostle Paul says it is better not to marry, but I feel that singlehood is just as complicated and confusing as marriage.
I am inclined to agree with the church that says men and women speak different languages, rather than the church that says, "You're single because you have baggage." I'd like to speak from personal experience, the one time in my life when I was struggling with baggage was when I found a really great guy and he dated me despite the baggage. I have since let go of that baggage, have none, and am now single. So poo on you, crazy church.
(Headed there as soon as I publish this, for some unknown reason.)
Posted by
arwenundomiel9
at
6:48 PM
0
comments
Saturday, February 19, 2011
Freemasons
So, I have an acquaintance who occasionally mentions his meetings at the local Mason Lodge. Up until his Freemason-related Facebook statuses began, my only "knowledge" of the Freemasons was that they are all conspiracy theorists (thanks Dan Brown) and cannibals (thanks Bones).
Now, you're probably going to get all uppity because my "knowledge" isn't even correctly drawn. Dan Brown's novel supposedly reveals secrets kept from society (making them the target of the conspiracy theorists and not the conspiracy theorists themselves). But as all prejudiced thinking works, I have drawn easier connections in my mind so that through the novel, the Freemasons = a society for conspiracy theorists to come together to discuss all the things our government is hiding from us.
And about the cannibalism bit- to be fair, the TV show Bones never stated that Freemasons are cannibals. They just made a fictional secret society that uses architectural clues and symbols to encode information and give off the aura of being the Freemasons, with one exception, and that being that they have also incorporated cannibalism. So in my preconceived notions of Freemasonry, we've got conspiracy theorists and cannibals.
Enter my friend, who seems to be a level-headed guy not prone to conspiracy theories OR cannibalism. His Facebook references to the Lodge triggered curiosity. Well, if they are not eating each other, or discussing whether or not the US put people on the moon, what are they doing? A quick Wikipedia search revealed nothing useful.
It seems that the Freemasons do not gather at their meetings in order to organize charity fundraisers, sponsor kids, or set up scholarships in any way. They don't get involved in philanthropy or humanitarian efforts; they don't seem to benefit society in any form at all. They also don't seem to be a "club" with common interests such as being veterans, involvement in local politics, model airplanes, or quilting. Nor do they seem to be a white supremacy group.
Does anyone know if this group has a purpose? And if they do not, how have they managed to be around for so long? Do they go to their lodge so they can sit around with other men, drink beer, and shake hands? If so, doesn't that kind of resemble a version of Calvin and Hobbes' club "G.R.O.S.S." but for grown men? And isn't that kind of ridiculous?
Can anyone clear this up for me, because I really would not like to associate my acquaintance with cannibalism. Thanks.
Posted by
arwenundomiel9
at
2:19 AM
0
comments
Friday, February 18, 2011
Whyyyyyyyy?
Ok, I really did look for a picture to put here with my post. But I couldn't find anything about the evils of love that wasn't bitter.
I'm not bitter. On a whim, I dug into my top drawer and pulled out a little leather-bound book of poetry I've written. I don't really write poetry much anymore but there was a time when I was writing quite prolifically about the things in my heart. As I browsed the pages I remembered the relationship moments that inspired the poems. And I realized something.
It does not matter whether the relationship was over before it began, burned like a candle from both ends, was long-lasting and peaceful yet slowly faded away, was deeply intimate like the poetry of Song of Solomon, or stormed through two lives like the weather at the ocean's shore. Somewhere in the course of the story, whether in the beginning, the middle, or at the end, that relationship will hurt. That is what love does.
Do people seek love because it improves the impact of their poetry?
Posted by
arwenundomiel9
at
11:30 AM
0
comments
Wednesday, February 09, 2011
My weight-gain diet...
The Mifflin-St. Jeor Equation:
RMR = 9.99w + 6.25s - 4.92a + 166g-161
The Mifflin-St. Jeor Equation explained:
RMR: Resting Metabolic Rate
w: weight in kilograms; if you know your weight in pounds, divide by 2.2 to get your weight in kilograms
s: height in centimeters; if you know your height in inches, multiply by 2.54 to get your height in centimeters
a: age in years
g: gender; 1 for males, 0 for females
RMR = 9.99*56.81 + 6.25*173.99 - 4.92*26 + 166*0 - 161
RMR = 567.5319 + 1087.4375 - 127.92 - 161
My Resting Metabolic Rate = 1366.0494
Calories to maintain weight: RMR*1.15 = 1570.95681
Calories to gain weight: 1570.95681 + 500 + 180 (lost during my 30 minutes of yoga , pilates, cardio) = ~2251
Actual results over the past 3 weeks: Gain two pounds, lose two pounds, gain two pounds, lose two pounds, gain two pounds, lose three pounds, gain two pounds. I just don't have the time to continually count calories, but instead I have focused on larger portion sizes, whole milk, whole grains, balanced meats, and more meals throughout the day. If this gain-lose cycle keeps going I may have to be more strict about it. My weight has not fluctuated this much in the past decade and even if it is only a few pounds, I'm not sure its healthy.
Posted by
arwenundomiel9
at
12:45 AM
0
comments
Thursday, February 03, 2011
Phil
Ok... seriously? I knew that some- where out in Penn- sylvania, on February 2nd every year, some people get really excited about a rodent I usually view as a nuisance. I also knew that people across the country base a major superstition on the actions of this rodent. But when I went to the weather channel today (because I was hoping the next inevitable snowstorm would be sometime this coming week), I happened across a video of the whole groundhog event, which I did not know was a camera-worthy event.
You mean to tell me that my whole life, men in Pennsylvania have been dressing up one day a year in "tuxedos," gloves, and top hats in order to proclaim from a scroll the actions of a large garden pest, and I am only finding out about it now? And why does the guy holding Phil look like Bill Engvall?
And phooey on him, he predicted an early spring, which everyone cheered about, which means I, by force of nature, must disagree with the "incrowd" and hope for six more weeks of winter.
Posted by
arwenundomiel9
at
10:14 AM
0
comments
Wednesday, February 02, 2011
Grammar Problem!!
"Wars are terrible and destructive...but there their for more than one reason."
Ok, people are having a hard time knowing the difference between "they're," "their," and "there." I get that. I don't know why it is such a hard concept, but I get that it is a common problem. But do you have to screw up twice in one sentence? Seriously?
At least this person didn't say "I realize people don't like the rules of grammar, but there their for they're own good."
Posted by
arwenundomiel9
at
9:15 PM
0
comments
Media Hype Alert!
While browsing some blogs, I came across one written by "TheBigShowAtUD." I felt he made some pretty good points: "I confidently believe that the lot of you are reasonable persons who've been expert pattern-spotters since diapers, bottled juices, and animal pajamas. I know. Just humor me, though. Not everyone in the contiguous United States understands that it SNOWS AROUND HERE when the temperature drops, you know, as it always does at this point on the calendar. Someone's mind was blown just now, and that person is responsible for the over-time news coverage of The Biggest Winter Storm Ever, every night. If it's you, then you probably thought Y2K was a big deal, but it's okay. I won't tell."
The author also discusses the media hype and coverage of all these snowstorms, especially when they come from meteorologists who finally feel they are getting their moment of fame on TV (my take on it, not his). Here's what he says: "Let's define 'de-icer,' because the name, itself, isn't obvious. That's how it works. If it's not the President interrupting my show with 'Things are about to get better,' then it's the local meteorologist in a tailored suit saying 'Things are about to get worse.'"
That about sums it all up, in my opinion.
EDIT: I have just discovered that the month of January for the north Jersey area where I am saw below average precipitation and above average high temperatures, despite having 12 days of snow and at least one snowstorm a week for the whole month. I realize lots of places in the country have had people seeing snow this year for the first time in their lives, but seriously... I really don't think snow is something that warrants more than 5 minutes on the news at night. Unless its snowing in Iraq. Or Cairo. Or Mars.
Posted by
arwenundomiel9
at
6:59 PM
0
comments


